Credit Default Swap (CDS)

Contributor Image
Written By
Contributor Image
Written By
James Barra
James is an investment writer with a background in financial services. As a former management consultant, he has worked on major operational transformation programmes at prominent European banks. James authors, edits and fact-checks content for a series of investing websites.
Contributor Image
Edited By
Contributor Image
Edited By
Jemma Grist
Jemma is a writer, editor and fact-checker focused on retail trading and investing. Jemma brings a unique perspective to the forex, stock, and cryptocurrency markets and works across several investment websites as a researcher and broker analyst.
Contributor Image
Fact Checked By
Contributor Image
Fact Checked By
Tobias Robinson
Tobias is a partner at DayTrading.com, director of a UK limited company and active trader. He has over 25 years of experience in the financial industry and contributed via CySec to the regulatory response to digital options and CFD trading in Europe. Toby’s expertise and dedication to financial education make him a trusted voice in the industry, including a BBC investigation into digital options.
Updated

A derivative instrument originally intended to allow an investor to transfer the risk of default, though in 2008, investors also began to use them to speculate on a particular firm’s credit risk. They are essentially Insurance against the risk of bankruptcy of a firm, a country or a non-government local authority; the buyer of a CDS pays an annual premium to the seller and receives a pre-agreed sum should the debt default.

In principle, the buyer of a CDS would be the holder of the underlying credit, whilst the seller would normally be a bank, hedge fund or an insurance company.

The underlying asset could be a corporate, government, a non-state agency or even a pool of collateralised debt obligations (CDO’s).

Click a broker for details
  1. 1
    FOREX.com
    Active Trader Program With A 15% Reduction In Costs

    Ratings
    4.9 / 5
    4 / 5
    4.3 / 5
    4.6 / 5
    4.6 / 5
    4.3 / 5
    4.8 / 5
    4.5 / 5
    3.6 / 5
    3.8 / 5

    $100
    0.01 Lots
    1:50
    NFA, CFTC
    Forex, Stocks, Futures, Futures Options
    MT4, MT5, TradingView, eSignal, AutoChartist, TradingCentral
    Wire Transfer, Credit Card, Debit Card, Visa, Mastercard, Skrill, Neteller, ACH Transfer
    USD, EUR, GBP, CAD, AUD, JPY, CHF, PLN
  2. 2
    NinjaTrader

    Ratings
    4.3 / 5
    2.8 / 5
    2.9 / 5
    4.3 / 5
    4.5 / 5
    4 / 5
    4 / 5
    4 / 5
    3 / 5
    3.2 / 5

    $0
    0.01 Lots
    1:50
    NFA, CFTC
    Forex, Stocks, Options, Commodities, Futures, Crypto
    NinjaTrader Desktop, Web & Mobile, eSignal
    ACH Transfer, Debit Card, Wire Transfer, Cheque
    USD
  3. 3
    eToro USA
    Invest $100 and get $10
    https://www.daytrading.com/ is not an affiliate and may be compensated if you access certain products or services offered by the MSB and/or the BD.

    Ratings
    4.3 / 5
    3 / 5
    3.9 / 5
    3.4 / 5
    4 / 5
    3 / 5
    4.3 / 5
    4.5 / 5
    4.3 / 5
    4 / 5

    $10
    $10
    SEC, FINRA
    Stocks, Options, ETFs, Crypto
    eToro Trading Platform & CopyTrader
    ACH Transfer, Debit Card, PayPal, Wire Transfer
    USD
  4. 4
    Interactive Brokers

    Ratings
    4.5 / 5
    3.5 / 5
    4.5 / 5
    4.3 / 5
    3.3 / 5
    3 / 5
    4.4 / 5
    4.3 / 5
    4.3 / 5
    4.5 / 5

    $0
    $100
    1:50
    FCA, SEC, FINRA, CFTC, CBI, CIRO, SFC, MAS, MNB, FINMA, AFM
    Stocks, Options, Futures, Forex, Funds, Bonds, ETFs, Mutual Funds, CFDs, Cryptocurrencies
    Trader Workstation (TWS), IBKR Desktop, GlobalTrader, Mobile, Client Portal, AlgoTrader, OmniTrader, eSignal, TradingCentral
    Cheque, ACH Transfer, Wire Transfer, Automated Customer Account Transfer Service, TransferWise, Debit Card
    USD, EUR, GBP, CAD, AUD, INR, JPY, SEK, NOK, DKK, CHF, AED, HUF

Trading Credit Default Swaps

The protection covers the risk of default by a bond issuer (the reference entity), for a specific tenor, (time period) which is usually 5 years in the interdealer market.

For CDS structurers, the tenor can be different, though the swap would normally match the maturity of the underlying bond issue. [If they do not coincide, both cash flow and yield calculations will be extremely difficult to calculate].

Only if a credit event occurs (under pre-agreed conditions) would the premium payments cease before maturity.

A credit event is triggered by, amongst other things, bankruptcy, failure to pay or repudiation of or a moratorium on debt by the reference entity.

In this situation, the seller of protection agrees to buy the bonds of the failed issuer at par (or 100% of face value), though this is more complicated if the CDS buyer did not own the underlying bonds-this entailed them participating in the auction for that debt, with limited certainty as to the price they would be paying.

If the auction price was $0.1 per dollar of debt, the protection provider would be liable for the remaining $0.90 of the outstanding $1 face value of the bonds.

Over time cash settlement became the norm, as this limited the ability of both sides of the contract to manipulate the auction results in their favour.

Origins Of Credit Default Swaps

The first CDS was introduced by JP Morgan in 1995- by mid-2007, there was more money invested in CDS’ than in US equities, mortgages and US Treasuries COMBINED.

The events of 2007-09 showed that diversification (i.e. selling a wide variety of protection in differing sectors etc.) was ineffective, as large numbers of entities defaulted simultaneously.

The lack of regulation allowed sellers of swaps to engage in this strategy despite limited capital available to cover defaults, meaning that a concentrated burst of credit events overwhelmed those sellers, who then defaulted on their obligations in turn.

Thus, holders of Swaps ultimately had a false sense of security; the protection they thought they owned proved illusory, as Washington Mutual found when the CDS protection they owned was negated by the bankruptcy of their counterparty, Lehman Brothers.

Risk was not thereby eliminated as supposed, but merely transformed into something else.